Transnational Repression on EU Soil
European Court of Human Rights

ECHR
Case

Al-Khalidi v. Bulgaria, Application No. 26364/24, communicated by the Court in April 2025 and currently pending before Strasbourg.

Status

Pending. Communicated to the respondent Government. Strongest factual ground: the January 2024 release order that was not executed.

The application

Al-Khalidi v. Bulgaria

The application is registered before the European Court of Human Rights under No. 26364/24. The HUDOC page is the main official reference and remains the canonical source for procedural updates.

The case concerns prolonged administrative immigration detention in Bulgaria, the risk of refoulement to Saudi Arabia, and the human rights consequences of continuing detention while asylum-related proceedings remained unresolved before the Bulgarian courts.

Counsel: Hristo Vasilev (Vasilev, Dobrinov & Associates) and Mr. Koynov, with international support from MENA Rights Group and other partners.

Key facts

The case at a glance

Application number

No. 26364/24, against Bulgaria.

Communicated

April 2025. The Court invited the respondent Government to submit observations.

Detention start

October 2021, at Busmantsi detention centre, Sofia. Later transferred to Lyubimets.

Strongest factual ground

A Bulgarian court ordered release on 18 January 2024. That order was never executed; the applicant remained in detention.

Pattern documented

Three Supreme Administrative Court rulings (2023–2025) annulled lower-court refusals of asylum. The lower court repeated the same errors after each annulment.

Open the file

Official HUDOC page

ECHR · HUDOC

Al-Khalidi v. Bulgaria — Application No. 26364/24

European Court of Human Rights

The official Court page for the application, including procedural status and communicated questions.

Strasbourg · Pending
Companion page

Full legal chronology

Free Abdulrahman

Detailed timeline of Bulgarian court decisions, release orders, and the procedural trajectory leading to Strasbourg.

On this site
Related European materials

European references on the case

EU & European Parliament

Why it matters

Beyond an individual case

The application raises questions that touch the architecture of EU asylum law itself: how administrative detention is used when intelligence agencies invoke national security without disclosing the file even to defence counsel; what procedural safeguards apply in such cases; and how Bulgaria honours non-refoulement obligations in proceedings where lower courts are repeatedly overturned and release orders go unexecuted.

A Strasbourg ruling on these questions would set a benchmark for similar cases of human rights defenders in EU detention systems.

Next

What you can do

Read the full legal chronology for the Bulgarian-court trajectory that led to Strasbourg.

Open the Take Action page for templates and contacts to raise the case with European institutions and your national representatives.

Share this page

Help spread the case